How the giveaway draw is fair

Every firm gives away exactly one evaluation account per day, drawn from its stakers. "Provably fair" is an easy phrase to print and a harder one to earn, so this page shows the mechanism: how the prize is sized, how the winner is drawn, and why neither can be rigged, including by us.

How the prize is sized

The prize ladder runs $1k, $5k, $10k, $25k, and the risk engine, not the operator, decides which rung each day's draw sits on. A larger prize requires two things at once: the firm's health score clearing that rung's gate, and the firm's treasury holding at least 25 times the prize's account size. The $1k floor is always available; the bigger rungs get progressively rarer even when unlocked. The result is a firm can never dangle a giveaway its own balance sheet couldn't honor, the same solvency-first logic that governs everything else the risk engine touches.

How the winner is drawn

The draw pool is the firm's stakers, snapshotted at the start of the day, so staking after the day begins doesn't enter that day's draw and last-second stake-and-win is structurally impossible.

Odds are weighted by the square root of stake, not stake itself. A staker with 100× your position gets 10× your odds, not 100×. Whales are favored, as they should be for backing the firm harder, but they can't simply buy the draw.

The randomness is the part that earns the word "provably":

1. A committed secret. The platform commits to a chain of secret values in advance, each day revealing the next link. Because each revealed value must hash back to the prior commitment, the platform can't swap in a different secret after seeing who staked.
2. A public beacon. The revealed secret is combined with a Solana blockhash from draw time, a value nobody, including the platform, can predict or steer in advance.
3. A deterministic draw. Prize size and winner both derive from that combined seed. Same inputs, same winner, every time, on anyone's machine.

A public verify endpoint recomputes any past draw from its published inputs. If a draw ever failed to reproduce, that would be visible to anyone who checked, which is the point.

Delivery is on-chain, not a coupon

The winner's evaluation is granted by an on-chain instruction that mints the account directly, the winner never signs anything and can't be asked to. Winners are notified in the terminal and, if they use the firm's bot, by Telegram DM.

What this doesn't claim

The giveaway is a staker perk, not a yield promise: it changes no pool's economics and covers no staking risk. And fairness here means the draw can't be rigged, not that the odds are equal; they're weighted by stake, published, and checkable, which is a different and more honest promise.